Superfreakonomics by Steven D. Levitt book cover

Superfreakonomics

by Steven D. Levitt · 2009

Steven D. Levitt's take on business, the honest verdict is below.

Worth reading? Levitt and Dubner's second round of 'the hidden side of everything,' weirder and more trivia-driven than the first. Read it for fun on a plane, not for a coherent thesis. Skip it if you wanted Freakonomics's tighter argument, this one wanders.

AuthorSteven D. Levitt
Published2009
CategoryBusiness & Money

ISBN: 9780060889579ISBN10: 0060889578ASIN: 0060889578

The Verdict

Levitt and Dubner’s second round of ‘the hidden side of everything,’ weirder and more trivia-driven than the first. Read it for fun on a plane, not for a coherent thesis. Skip it if you wanted Freakonomics’s tighter argument, this one wanders.

Read it if

anyone weighing whether Superfreakonomics belongs on their business and money shelf

Superfreakonomics by Steven D. Levitt: book review and summary

Top 8 Lessons from Superfreakonomics

  1. Conventional wisdom is usually someone's story, not the data.
  2. Incentives explain behavior better than morals do, follow the incentive.
  3. Terrorism is statistically less deadly than everyday hazards we ignore.
  4. Information changes everything: know more and you act completely differently.
  5. Cheap, boring fixes (like fertilizer) beat splashy ones for saving lives.
  6. Names, police timing, and seatbelts have counterintuitive effects on outcomes.
  7. Experts often defend their field's myths; data doesn't care about their pride.
  8. Small behavioral nudges produce big shifts in huge systems.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Superfreakonomics worth reading?

Yes for an entertaining read full of surprising stats. No if you want a single strong argument.

What is the main idea of Superfreakonomics?

The world is weirder than the headlines say; follow incentives and data to see the real story.

Who should read Superfreakonomics?

Curious readers who like pop-economics puzzles over a serious textbook.

Should I read Freakonomics first?

Not required, but the first book is tighter. This one is looser and more trivia-heavy.